Wednesday, May 22, 2019
Bullying in School
Bullying 1. I read the article, Jury Orders groom District to Pay $800,000 to Bullied Student. This article was ab tabu a son named Dane Patterson, who had been bullied all through middle condition and his early high discipline c areer. He claims that the school failed to protect him from familys of hector, and it finally came to be enough when he was sexually harassed in the console room. As a result to this, the Patterson family filed a lawsuit under Title IX of the Equal Opportunity in Education Act, using the sexual bedevilment story as the basis.This week, the jury ordered the school district to pay Dane $800,000 to make up for the damages and hurt compositors cased by the ongoing situation. Anti- hector experts argue that this finding of fact will send a clear message to schools that they are in fact amenable for sexual anguish and pranceing, and that they must keep a ceaseless eye out for such behavior. 2. In my opinion, I do not think schools should be held full y responsible for bullying.I think that maybe they should make much of an effort to pr pull downt it, but there is no way they sack up take care of all the bullying issues that happen in school. For example, some kids siret even make an effort to ask for help, or let any iodin know they are being bullied, so the school shouldnt be held responsible for a situation they arent even aware is occurring to begin with. In Danes situation however, I conceptualise the school should be held responsible because he clearly asked for help and didnt receive any, and this had been going on since middle schoolI think that schools should be fully accountable nevertheless if the youngster seeks out help numerous times and doesnt receive it, or if the school doesnt do everything in their power to make the bullying go away. On the other hand, there are some situations which the school cannot control, like I said in the basic example if that is the case, I dont believe the school should be held responsible. 3. I believe that the parents of the bullys should be held at least slimly responsible for their childs actions because past they could stop the bullying before it gets out of control.Ultimately, schools are responsible for keeping an eye out on bullying and regulating the behavior, but there are some cases in which they just cannot control, and then they shouldnt be held responsible. Obesity 1. For obesity, I read the article, Pepsi Initiates Move to comforter Sugared Soft Drinks from give lessonss in two hundred Countries. This article was about PepsiCo Incs announcement, as of Tuesday of this week, about how they planning to remove all of their full-calorie sweetened soft drinks from schools in more than 200 countries by the year 2012 to reduce the curl of obesity.The article also mentions that earlier this month, Coca-Cola made a similar announcement, but they feel they should only eliminate soft drink gross sales from schools only if parents make a reques t. Of course, both companies realize that eliminating soft drinks will not end the rising trend of childhood obesity, but they believe that study better eating and drinking habits in schools are certainly a step in the right direction. 2. I dont think that schools should be held accountable for obesity in any sense.Schools should strive to sell healthier food, but they are not the cause of obesity. The school is not responsible for the count of food a child buys, so schools should not be responsible for obesity. 3. In my opinion, obesity is more caused by eating habits in life orthogonal of school, such as home or going out and getting fast food all the time. Its even genetic. I dont believe schools should be responsible for obesity because the child controls their own eating habits, not the school.Bullying in SchoolBullying should be a crime. It is very cruel and unethical. Each day an estimated 160,000 students miss school for fear of being bullied and 10 percent of students wh o drop out do so because of repeated bullying (Dalton 1). The way it makes children feel isnt fair. Imagine that happening to yourself. Bullying in schools presents problems to every age group therefore there should be more bullying prevention programs to help get rid of the problem. Younger age Bullying is a topic that needs to be talked about.Younger age is defined from kindergarten to seventh grade. Children bully because they feel they need to overpower mountain. They also bully because they think they are better than others or some people just have a low self-esteem. When Younger kids bully it is normally name calling, teasing, or fashioning fun of them by the way they look, speak, or even how smart they are Older age bullying is another one of my topics. Older age bullying is defined from the grades of eighth to a senior in high school.People in the Older age group bully for mainly the same reasons. When older people normally bully, it is a lot more decompose then younger a ge bullying. Although most victims of bullying in schools are too meek to take matter into their own hands, a few of them can be pushed to certain critical limits. 60% of identified bullies during their grade 6-9 years eventually got involved in at least one criminal reliance by age 24. Bullying in Schools (1). Older age bullying normally ends up violent and is a lot more severe then younger age bullying.They get into fights or harassment is filed, these are the main things that happen. People will take all of someones strength and will and harass or fight them just to make them feel better about themselves. This is bad because the children who are being bullied do not deserve what they are getting. Nobody deserves to be harassed and manipulated for no reason or any reason. Most of the time, the people that are being bullied, it isnt their fault at all. Prevention is another athletic field of concern.According to the online article, Bullying Academy, every school needs a anti-bul ly website for students, educators, and parents. This world needs to realize what is going on with bullying in schools and take action(1). any school should have monitors of bullying throughout the halls and classrooms all day long. This is just one thing you could do to prevent bullying. There are many things that you could do, depending on what one your school board would like the most. Every city or town should take money from their funds and put it into schools and bullying prevention programs.According to the online article pity School Community, prevention focuses on strengthening students connectedness to schoolan important element for increasing academic motivation and achievement and for reducing drug use, violence, and delinquency. Every school should have a bullying prevention program, where parents and students could come and learn about bullying. These programs could also talk about how it affects people. They should give statistics about what people who bully end up doing in their lives and what people that dont bully end up doing in their lives. I also think we are making important progress towards discovering how successful anti-bullying programs can be (Dr. Ken 1). Bullying in schools is wrong and we should have more bullying prevention programs. My main mind in writing this paper is to inform people that bullying is wrong. Also I wish that everyone be more aware about the situation, and dont deny it because it is happening whether you would like to admit it or not. People need to stand up and take charge and make a change in peoples lives. People who are being bullied would love if you took a couple hours of your week just to help them get over the struggles in life.Bullying in SchoolBullying 1. I read the article, Jury Orders School District to Pay $800,000 to Bullied Student. This article was about a boy named Dane Patterson, who had been bullied all through middle school and his early high school career. He claims that the school fail ed to protect him from years of bullying, and it finally came to be enough when he was sexually harassed in the locker room. As a result to this, the Patterson family filed a lawsuit under Title IX of the Equal Opportunity in Education Act, using the sexual harassment story as the basis.This week, the jury ordered the school district to pay Dane $800,000 to make up for the damages and trauma caused by the ongoing situation. Anti-bullying experts argue that this verdict will send a clear message to schools that they are in fact responsible for sexual harassment and bullying, and that they must keep a constant eye out for such behavior. 2. In my opinion, I do not think schools should be held fully responsible for bullying.I think that maybe they should make more of an effort to prevent it, but there is no way they can take care of all the bullying issues that happen in school. For example, some kids dont even make an effort to ask for help, or let anyone know they are being bullied, s o the school shouldnt be held accountable for a situation they arent even aware is occurring to begin with. In Danes situation however, I believe the school should be held responsible because he clearly asked for help and didnt receive any, and this had been going on since middle schoolI think that schools should be fully accountable only if the child seeks out help numerous times and doesnt receive it, or if the school doesnt do everything in their power to make the bullying go away. On the other hand, there are some situations which the school cannot control, like I said in the first example if that is the case, I dont believe the school should be held responsible. 3. I believe that the parents of the bullys should be held at least somewhat responsible for their childs actions because then they could stop the bullying before it gets out of control.Ultimately, schools are responsible for keeping an eye out on bullying and regulating the behavior, but there are some cases in which t hey just cannot control, therefore they shouldnt be held responsible. Obesity 1. For obesity, I read the article, Pepsi Initiates Move to Pull Sugared Soft Drinks from Schools in 200 Countries. This article was about PepsiCo Incs announcement, as of Tuesday of this week, about how they planning to remove all of their full-calorie sweetened soft drinks from schools in more than 200 countries by the year 2012 to reduce the trend of obesity.The article also mentions that earlier this month, Coca-Cola made a similar announcement, but they feel they should only eliminate soft drink sales from schools only if parents make a request. Of course, both companies realize that eliminating soft drinks will not end the rising trend of childhood obesity, but they believe that learning better eating and drinking habits in schools are certainly a step in the right direction. 2. I dont think that schools should be held accountable for obesity in any sense.Schools should strive to sell healthier food , but they are not the cause of obesity. The school is not responsible for the amount of food a child buys, so schools should not be responsible for obesity. 3. In my opinion, obesity is more caused by eating habits in life outside of school, such as home or going out and getting fast food all the time. Its even genetic. I dont believe schools should be responsible for obesity because the child controls their own eating habits, not the school.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.